The Punch-In
3Nov/093

Daily Kindling: Illegal Downloaders Buy More Music?

Editorial by Zach Wendkos

According to a recent poll, people who illegally download music online are also more likely to purchase music online. The poll, which surveyed 1,000 16- to 50-year-olds with internet access, found that one in 10 people admit to downloading music illegally. The survey found that those who admit to illegally downloading music spent an average of about $125/year on music, which is about $75/year more than people who claimed they never download illegally.

Downloading Music

Obviously most music industry buffs would disagree with the results of this survey and certainly there are are studies out there to prove everything from the health benefits of smoking to the existence of the Loch Ness monster, but it still raises an interesting question. Do people use illegal downloading to sample or try more music, thus enticing them to spend more money on music?

I believe that illegal downloading must be accepted in the new era of music business--in fact, I believe it should be embraced. The more ears on your music, the more dollars in your pocket. Whether it be from downloads on iTunes or MySpace, CDs in the stores, tickets to your shows, or other related items like apparel or concert DVDs, revenue will increase as exposure increases. It's marketing 101. Mark Mulligan of Forrester Research would agree:

"The people who file-share are the ones who are interested in music. They use file-sharing as a discovery mechanism. We have a generation of young people who don't have any concept of music as a paid-for commodity. You need to have it at a price point you won't notice."

Now there certainly need to be ramifications in the laws of music downloading and in the business models of music industry giants. This will take time, but "pirating" music is never going to end. In fact, it will only grow, and I believe that's a good thing!

What do you think? And what type of music consumer are you? Let me know in the poll below:

Source: The Independent

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments (3) Trackbacks (5)
  1. Great post and I totally agree. I think they should be selling albums for about $5 a pop. I think the view of albums should change into a vehicle for promotion rather than as a point of profit for the artist. As you said, putting more of your music into the hands of more consumers will help in the long run in building your brand and hopefully translate in greater ticket sales. And with the way ticket prices are going – that’s definitely where many artists make their bread.

  2. Thanks for the feedback, Brian. You make a great point. The biz is evolving indeed, and the artists who can find new ways of generating revenue besides selling albums will be king. At the very least, musicians must create more incentive to buy music, like John Mayer giving first dibs on concert tickets to fans who pre-order his new album, Battle Studies. Mayer is very bright and very progressive (with his music and his business models) and is one of the most popular people on Twitter. He has a huge following and takes advantage of it the right way, making the fans seem more like friends and less like dollar signs. It’s all about building a brand.

  3. @Brian: Funny, I have a friend who said the same exact thing about putting albums at five dollars a pop. The ticket prices HAVE been going up for awhile anyways. Is it compensation for a meager amount they receive for album sales as a whole? LiveNation might as well be the record label nowadays. I delve into these points because I have to give a speech on this exact matter tomorrow!


Leave a comment